Side-by-side comparison of Codestral 22B (Mistral AI · France) and Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI · France) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. Codestral 22B is rated conditional; Mistral Medium 3.5 is EU-ready. They part ways on licence: Codestral 22B is "MNPL (non-prod)", Mistral Medium 3.5 is "Modified MIT".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional EU code model trained on 80+ languages. Licensed under Mistral Non-Production License — blocked for any production or commercial deployment without a paid commercial licence. Use Codestral Mamba (Apache 2.0) if you need commercial freedom. | EU-ready Per Mistral's published license, Mistral Medium 3.5 ships under a Modified MIT License: vanilla-MIT terms for independent developers, startups and most enterprises, with a revenue-threshold carve-out that routes large companies back to a paid commercial agreement. Paris-headquartered vendor with EU jurisdiction end to end and a 256k-token context. Training-data composition is not published in the model card — usual caveat for high-assurance public-sector deployments. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-15 | 2026-05-03 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | MNPL (non-prod) | Modified MIT |
| Commercial use | Paid licence req. | Permitted (revenue cap) |
| Training data | Partial | Undisclosed |
| Origin | EU | EU (France) |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | — | — |
| Speed | — | — |
| Blended price | — | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.