Side-by-side comparison of Codestral 22B (Mistral AI · France) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct (Mistral AI · France) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. Codestral 22B is rated conditional; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct is EU-ready. They part ways on licence: Codestral 22B is "MNPL (non-prod)", Mixtral 8x22B Instruct is "Apache 2.0".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional EU code model trained on 80+ languages. Licensed under Mistral Non-Production License — blocked for any production or commercial deployment without a paid commercial licence. Use Codestral Mamba (Apache 2.0) if you need commercial freedom. | EU-ready A rare combination of permissive licensing, EU provenance, and credible multilingual coverage — Apache 2.0 leaves commercial deployment essentially unconstrained, and Paris-based Mistral simplifies the GDPR controller story compared with US-hosted peers. The catch is the training corpus: Mistral has never published a meaningful dataset breakdown, so AI Act transparency obligations on training-data summaries land squarely on the deployer. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-15 | 2026-05-19 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | MNPL (non-prod) | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial use | Paid licence req. | Unrestricted |
| Training data | Partial | Undisclosed |
| Origin | EU | EU (France) |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | — | — |
| Speed | — | — |
| Blended price | — | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.