Side-by-side comparison of DBRX Instruct (Databricks · USA) and Kimi-K2.6 (Moonshot AI · China) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. DBRX Instruct is rated conditional; Kimi-K2.6 is conditional. They part ways on licence: DBRX Instruct is "Databricks Open", Kimi-K2.6 is "Modified MIT".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional 132B MoE (36B active). Databricks Open Model License is bespoke — allows commercial use with acceptable-use policy and a 700M-MAU-style cap. Read the licence carefully; not Apache 2.0. | Conditional Per the published LICENSE file, Kimi-K2.6 ships under a Modified MIT licence: identical to standard MIT for almost all deployers, with an additional UI-attribution requirement only for products exceeding 100M monthly active users or USD 20M monthly revenue. The genuine EU-readiness concerns are the China-based vendor and the absence of any training-data disclosure rather than the licence itself. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-15 | 2026-04-28 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Databricks Open | Modified MIT |
| Commercial use | With caps | Attribution at scale |
| Training data | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Origin | USA | China |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 8/100 | 54/100 |
| Speed | — | — |
| Blended price | — | $1.71/M |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.