Side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek-V4-Pro (DeepSeek · China) and Qwen 2.5 (Alibaba · China) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. DeepSeek-V4-Pro is rated conditional; Qwen 2.5 is conditional. They part ways on licence: DeepSeek-V4-Pro is "MIT", Qwen 2.5 is "Apache 2.0".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional Per the published LICENSE file, DeepSeek-V4-Pro ships under MIT with no commercial restrictions, so the weights themselves are deployable. The caveats are non-EU jurisdiction and a training corpus described only by aggregate token count (32T+) without a dataset list — both should be documented in any GDPR or AI Act compliance file before regulated use. | Conditional Legally clean under Apache 2.0, but Chinese origin raises supply-chain and geopolitical questions. Vet carefully for sensitive use cases. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-28 | 2026-04-15 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | MIT | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial use | Unrestricted | Yes |
| Training data | Categories only | Undisclosed |
| Origin | China | China |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 52/100 | 16/100 |
| Speed | 36 tok/s | 55 tok/s |
| Blended price | $2.17/M | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.