Side-by-side comparison of Gemma 4 E4B Instruct (Google DeepMind · United States) and Kimi K2 Instruct (Moonshot AI · China) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. Gemma 4 E4B Instruct is rated conditional; Kimi K2 Instruct is conditional. They part ways on licence: Gemma 4 E4B Instruct is "Apache 2.0", Kimi K2 Instruct is "Modified MIT".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional Based on published licence terms, Gemma 4 E4B is an edge-optimised multimodal variant under pure Apache 2.0 with no prohibited-use carve-outs. Audio input (30s) and on-device deployment push GDPR biometric, AI Act emotion-recognition, and Art. 25 data-protection-by-design obligations entirely onto the integrator with no Google-side telemetry or kill-switch. | Conditional 1T-parameter MoE (32B active) tuned for agentic and tool-use workflows. Modified MIT permits commercial use. Same Chinese-origin alignment and supply-chain considerations as DeepSeek and Qwen. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-17 | 2026-04-16 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Apache 2.0 | Modified MIT |
| Commercial use | Unrestricted | Yes |
| Training data | Domain-level summary | Undisclosed |
| Origin | United States | China |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 15/100 | 26/100 |
| Speed | — | 34 tok/s |
| Blended price | — | $1.04/M |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.