Side-by-side comparison of Gemma 4 (Google · USA) and Llama 3.3 70B (Meta · USA) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. Gemma 4 is rated EU-ready; Llama 3.3 70B is conditional. They part ways on licence: Gemma 4 is "Apache 2.0", Llama 3.3 70B is "Llama community".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | EU-ready Major licence shift from Gemma 2/3: Apache 2.0 across the family. 140+ languages, multimodal (text/image/audio/video on small sizes), 128K-256K context. Strong permissive default for EU deployments that need robust multilingual support. | Conditional Strong 70B model, near-flagship quality at smaller size. Same Llama community licence as Llama 4: 700M MAU cap, acceptable-use policy, 'Built with Llama' attribution required. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-15 | 2026-04-15 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Apache 2.0 | Llama community |
| Commercial use | Yes | With caps |
| Training data | Partial | Undisclosed |
| Origin | USA | USA |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 32/100 | 15/100 |
| Speed | — | 97 tok/s |
| Blended price | — | $0.68/M |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.