Side-by-side comparison of Gemma 4 (Google · USA) and Qwen3.6-27B (Alibaba (Qwen)) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. Gemma 4 is rated EU-ready; Qwen3.6-27B is conditional. They part ways on commercial use: Gemma 4 is "Yes", Qwen3.6-27B is "Unrestricted".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | EU-ready Major licence shift from Gemma 2/3: Apache 2.0 across the family. 140+ languages, multimodal (text/image/audio/video on small sizes), 128K-256K context. Strong permissive default for EU deployments that need robust multilingual support. | Conditional Per the published Apache 2.0 licence, the Qwen3.6-27B weights are deployable without commercial restriction, including for vision-language and 1M-context workloads. The blockers for regulated EU use are the China-based vendor and the absence of any training-data disclosure on the model card — both should be mitigated through self-hosting and a deployer-prepared GPAI compliance file. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-15 | 2026-04-28 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial use | Yes | Unrestricted |
| Training data | Partial | Undisclosed |
| Origin | USA | China |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 32/100 | 46/100 |
| Speed | — | 66 tok/s |
| Blended price | — | $1.35/M |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.