Side-by-side comparison of GLM-4.5 (Zhipu AI · China) and Llama 4 Scout (Meta · USA) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. GLM-4.5 is rated conditional; Llama 4 Scout is conditional. They part ways on licence: GLM-4.5 is "MIT", Llama 4 Scout is "Llama community".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional MoE flagship from Zhipu under MIT. Strong agentic and coding benchmarks. Same Chinese-origin alignment and geopolitical considerations as DeepSeek / Qwen. | Conditional Smaller Llama 4 variant: 17B active over 16 experts, multimodal. More self-hostable than Maverick. Same Llama community licence caveats. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-15 | 2026-04-15 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | MIT | Llama community |
| Commercial use | Yes | With caps |
| Training data | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Origin | China | USA |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 26/100 | 14/100 |
| Speed | 44 tok/s | 128 tok/s |
| Blended price | $0.84/M | $0.29/M |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.