Side-by-side comparison of GPT-OSS 20B (OpenAI · USA) and MiniCPM5-1B (OpenBMB) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. GPT-OSS 20B is rated conditional; MiniCPM5-1B is conditional. They part ways on training data: GPT-OSS 20B is "Domain-level summary", MiniCPM5-1B is "Documented".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional Based on published licence terms, GPT-OSS 20B is released under Apache 2.0 with no field-of-use carve-outs in the licence itself; OpenAI publishes a separate non-binding 'gpt-oss usage policy' as guidance. Training-data disclosure is domain-level only, and US origin carries Schrems-II / CLOUD-Act exposure that enterprise deployers should document for EU workloads. | Conditional Per the published Apache 2.0 LICENSE, the 1.08B-parameter weights carry no use restrictions and are well suited to on-device or edge deployments. Unusually for a Chinese-origin release, OpenBMB ships a full data card naming every pre-training and SFT corpus, which closes the AI Act Art. 53 transparency gap most peers leave open. The remaining hedge for regulated EU buyers is vendor jurisdiction (Tsinghua-affiliated lab, mainland China) — self-host the weights and treat any vendor-side service as out of scope. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-17 | 2026-05-30 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial use | Unrestricted | Unrestricted |
| Training data | Domain-level summary | Documented |
| Origin | United States | China |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 25/100 | — |
| Speed | 294 tok/s | — |
| Blended price | $0.10/M | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.