Side-by-side comparison of IBM Granite 3 (IBM · USA) and Qwen 2.5 (Alibaba · China) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. IBM Granite 3 is rated EU-ready; Qwen 2.5 is conditional. They part ways on training data: IBM Granite 3 is "Disclosed", Qwen 2.5 is "Undisclosed".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | EU-ready Enterprise-focused Granite 3 family under Apache 2.0, with unusual-for-the-industry training-data disclosure. IBM provides IP indemnification when used via watsonx. Strong default for regulated enterprise pilots. | Conditional Legally clean under Apache 2.0, but Chinese origin raises supply-chain and geopolitical questions. Vet carefully for sensitive use cases. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-15 | 2026-04-15 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial use | Yes | Yes |
| Training data | Disclosed | Undisclosed |
| Origin | USA | China |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 7/100 | 16/100 |
| Speed | 409 tok/s | 55 tok/s |
| Blended price | $0.09/M | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.