Side-by-side comparison of Kimi-K2.6 (Moonshot AI · China) and Laguna XS.2 (Poolside · USA) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. Kimi-K2.6 is rated conditional; Laguna XS.2 is conditional. They part ways on licence: Kimi-K2.6 is "Modified MIT", Laguna XS.2 is "Apache 2.0".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional Per the published LICENSE file, Kimi-K2.6 ships under a Modified MIT licence: identical to standard MIT for almost all deployers, with an additional UI-attribution requirement only for products exceeding 100M monthly active users or USD 20M monthly revenue. The genuine EU-readiness concerns are the China-based vendor and the absence of any training-data disclosure rather than the licence itself. | Conditional Per the published model card, Laguna XS.2 is an Apache 2.0 33B / 3B-active MoE positioned for local agentic coding, with a 131k-token context and FP8 KV cache aimed at single-machine inference. Permissive license and self-hostable weights make EU-side deployment straightforward; the limits are vendor jurisdiction (San Francisco–headquartered, no published EU DPA for hosted endpoints) and a model card that does not describe the training corpus. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-28 | 2026-05-03 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Modified MIT | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial use | Attribution at scale | Unrestricted |
| Training data | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Origin | China | USA |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 54/100 | — |
| Speed | — | — |
| Blended price | $1.71/M | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.