Side-by-side comparison of Kimi-K2.6 (Moonshot AI · China) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Xiaomi (MiMo)) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. Kimi-K2.6 is rated conditional; MiMo-V2.5-Pro is conditional. They part ways on licence: Kimi-K2.6 is "Modified MIT", MiMo-V2.5-Pro is "MIT".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional Per the published LICENSE file, Kimi-K2.6 ships under a Modified MIT licence: identical to standard MIT for almost all deployers, with an additional UI-attribution requirement only for products exceeding 100M monthly active users or USD 20M monthly revenue. The genuine EU-readiness concerns are the China-based vendor and the absence of any training-data disclosure rather than the licence itself. | Conditional Per the published LICENSE file, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ships under MIT, so the weights themselves carry no commercial restriction. The remaining EU-readiness gaps are the China-based vendor and the corpus disclosure that names training-stage categories (text pre-training, multimodal pre-training, SFT, RL, MOPD) without listing datasets — both should be addressed in any GPAI deployer file before regulated use. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-28 | 2026-04-28 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Modified MIT | MIT |
| Commercial use | Attribution at scale | Unrestricted |
| Training data | Undisclosed | Categories only |
| Origin | China | China |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 54/100 | 54/100 |
| Speed | — | 65 tok/s |
| Blended price | $1.71/M | $1.50/M |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.