Side-by-side comparison of Kimi-K2.6 (Moonshot AI · China) and Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI · France) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. Kimi-K2.6 is rated conditional; Mistral Medium 3.5 is EU-ready. They part ways on commercial use: Kimi-K2.6 is "Attribution at scale", Mistral Medium 3.5 is "Permitted (revenue cap)".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional Per the published LICENSE file, Kimi-K2.6 ships under a Modified MIT licence: identical to standard MIT for almost all deployers, with an additional UI-attribution requirement only for products exceeding 100M monthly active users or USD 20M monthly revenue. The genuine EU-readiness concerns are the China-based vendor and the absence of any training-data disclosure rather than the licence itself. | EU-ready Per Mistral's published license, Mistral Medium 3.5 ships under a Modified MIT License: vanilla-MIT terms for independent developers, startups and most enterprises, with a revenue-threshold carve-out that routes large companies back to a paid commercial agreement. Paris-headquartered vendor with EU jurisdiction end to end and a 256k-token context. Training-data composition is not published in the model card — usual caveat for high-assurance public-sector deployments. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-28 | 2026-05-03 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Modified MIT | Modified MIT |
| Commercial use | Attribution at scale | Permitted (revenue cap) |
| Training data | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Origin | China | EU (France) |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 54/100 | — |
| Speed | — | — |
| Blended price | $1.71/M | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.