Side-by-side comparison of Kimi-K2.6 (Moonshot AI · China) and Qwen 2.5 (Alibaba · China) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. Kimi-K2.6 is rated conditional; Qwen 2.5 is conditional. They part ways on licence: Kimi-K2.6 is "Modified MIT", Qwen 2.5 is "Apache 2.0".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional Per the published LICENSE file, Kimi-K2.6 ships under a Modified MIT licence: identical to standard MIT for almost all deployers, with an additional UI-attribution requirement only for products exceeding 100M monthly active users or USD 20M monthly revenue. The genuine EU-readiness concerns are the China-based vendor and the absence of any training-data disclosure rather than the licence itself. | Conditional Legally clean under Apache 2.0, but Chinese origin raises supply-chain and geopolitical questions. Vet carefully for sensitive use cases. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-28 | 2026-04-15 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Modified MIT | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial use | Attribution at scale | Yes |
| Training data | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Origin | China | China |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 54/100 | 16/100 |
| Speed | — | 55 tok/s |
| Blended price | $1.71/M | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.