Side-by-side comparison of LFM2.5-8B-A1B (Liquid AI) and Llama 4 Maverick (Meta · USA) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. LFM2.5-8B-A1B is rated conditional; Llama 4 Maverick is conditional. They part ways on licence: LFM2.5-8B-A1B is "LFM Open License 1.0", Llama 4 Maverick is "Llama community".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional Per the published LFM Open License v1.0, Liquid AI's terms are Apache-2.0-derived but cap free commercial use at USD 10M annual company revenue — above that threshold deployers must negotiate a paid licence with [email protected]. The model itself is a strong 8.3B / 1.5B-active MoE built for CPU and edge inference, but the 38-trillion-token training corpus is undisclosed and Liquid AI is a US-based MIT spinoff, so EU regulated buyers should run their own DPIA and document the data-transfer story alongside any commercial-tier negotiation. | Conditional Llama 4 flagship: MoE with 17B active over 128 experts, natively multimodal (text + images). Same Llama community licence as the family: 700M MAU cap, acceptable-use policy, 'Built with Llama' attribution. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-05-30 | 2026-04-15 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | LFM Open License 1.0 | Llama community |
| Commercial use | Free under $10M revenue | With caps |
| Training data | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Origin | USA (Boston) | USA |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | — | 18/100 |
| Speed | — | 116 tok/s |
| Blended price | — | $0.50/M |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.