Side-by-side comparison of LFM2.5-8B-A1B (Liquid AI) and Mistral Nemo (Mistral AI · France) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. LFM2.5-8B-A1B is rated conditional; Mistral Nemo is EU-ready. They part ways on licence: LFM2.5-8B-A1B is "LFM Open License 1.0", Mistral Nemo is "Apache 2.0".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional Per the published LFM Open License v1.0, Liquid AI's terms are Apache-2.0-derived but cap free commercial use at USD 10M annual company revenue — above that threshold deployers must negotiate a paid licence with [email protected]. The model itself is a strong 8.3B / 1.5B-active MoE built for CPU and edge inference, but the 38-trillion-token training corpus is undisclosed and Liquid AI is a US-based MIT spinoff, so EU regulated buyers should run their own DPIA and document the data-transfer story alongside any commercial-tier negotiation. | EU-ready A 12B model from Paris-based Mistral AI, co-trained with NVIDIA and shipped under Apache 2.0 with a 128k context window and strong coverage of major EU languages. EU-headquartered vendor plus a fully permissive licence make this one of the cleanest open-weight choices for organisations prioritising AI Act and GDPR alignment, with the main caveat being the usual lack of detail on the training corpus. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-05-30 | 2026-05-19 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | LFM Open License 1.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial use | Free under $10M revenue | Unrestricted |
| Training data | Undisclosed | Undisclosed corpus |
| Origin | USA (Boston) | EU (France) |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | — | — |
| Speed | — | — |
| Blended price | — | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.