Side-by-side comparison of Llama 3.1 405B (Meta · USA) and MiMo-V2.5 (Xiaomi (MiMo)) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. Llama 3.1 405B is rated conditional; MiMo-V2.5 is conditional. They part ways on licence: Llama 3.1 405B is "Llama community", MiMo-V2.5 is "MIT".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional Frontier-class 405B open model. Self-hosting requires serious compute (8×H100 minimum at FP8). Same Llama community licence caveats as the rest of the family. | Conditional MiMo-V2.5 is the omnimodal sibling of MiMo-V2.5-Pro — text, vision, audio, and video on a single sparse-MoE backbone, also under MIT. Same posture as the Pro: deployable weights, but the China origin and stage-level training disclosure mean any EU rollout needs self-hosting plus a deployer-prepared GPAI compliance file, with extra attention to Article 50 transparency for synthetic and biometric outputs. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-15 | 2026-04-28 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Llama community | MIT |
| Commercial use | With caps | Unrestricted |
| Training data | Undisclosed | Categories only |
| Origin | USA | China |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 17/100 | 49/100 |
| Speed | 31 tok/s | — |
| Blended price | $3.69/M | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.