Side-by-side comparison of Llama 3.1 405B (Meta · USA) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Xiaomi (MiMo)) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. Llama 3.1 405B is rated conditional; MiMo-V2.5-Pro is conditional. They part ways on licence: Llama 3.1 405B is "Llama community", MiMo-V2.5-Pro is "MIT".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional Frontier-class 405B open model. Self-hosting requires serious compute (8×H100 minimum at FP8). Same Llama community licence caveats as the rest of the family. | Conditional Per the published LICENSE file, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ships under MIT, so the weights themselves carry no commercial restriction. The remaining EU-readiness gaps are the China-based vendor and the corpus disclosure that names training-stage categories (text pre-training, multimodal pre-training, SFT, RL, MOPD) without listing datasets — both should be addressed in any GPAI deployer file before regulated use. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-15 | 2026-04-28 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Llama community | MIT |
| Commercial use | With caps | Unrestricted |
| Training data | Undisclosed | Categories only |
| Origin | USA | China |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 17/100 | 54/100 |
| Speed | 31 tok/s | 65 tok/s |
| Blended price | $3.69/M | $1.50/M |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.