Side-by-side comparison of Llama 3.3 70B (Meta · USA) and Llama 4 Maverick (Meta · USA) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. Llama 3.3 70B is rated conditional; Llama 4 Maverick is conditional. On the four sovereignty dimensions we track, they score identically — the difference is in context and org posture.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional Strong 70B model, near-flagship quality at smaller size. Same Llama community licence as Llama 4: 700M MAU cap, acceptable-use policy, 'Built with Llama' attribution required. | Conditional Llama 4 flagship: MoE with 17B active over 128 experts, natively multimodal (text + images). Same Llama community licence as the family: 700M MAU cap, acceptable-use policy, 'Built with Llama' attribution. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-15 | 2026-04-15 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Llama community | Llama community |
| Commercial use | With caps | With caps |
| Training data | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Origin | USA | USA |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 15/100 | 18/100 |
| Speed | 97 tok/s | 116 tok/s |
| Blended price | $0.68/M | $0.50/M |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.