Side-by-side comparison of Llama 4 Scout (Meta · USA) and MiniCPM5-1B (OpenBMB) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. Llama 4 Scout is rated conditional; MiniCPM5-1B is conditional. They part ways on licence: Llama 4 Scout is "Llama community", MiniCPM5-1B is "Apache 2.0".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional Smaller Llama 4 variant: 17B active over 16 experts, multimodal. More self-hostable than Maverick. Same Llama community licence caveats. | Conditional Per the published Apache 2.0 LICENSE, the 1.08B-parameter weights carry no use restrictions and are well suited to on-device or edge deployments. Unusually for a Chinese-origin release, OpenBMB ships a full data card naming every pre-training and SFT corpus, which closes the AI Act Art. 53 transparency gap most peers leave open. The remaining hedge for regulated EU buyers is vendor jurisdiction (Tsinghua-affiliated lab, mainland China) — self-host the weights and treat any vendor-side service as out of scope. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-15 | 2026-05-30 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Llama community | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial use | With caps | Unrestricted |
| Training data | Undisclosed | Documented |
| Origin | USA | China |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 14/100 | — |
| Speed | 128 tok/s | — |
| Blended price | $0.29/M | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.