Side-by-side comparison of Llama 4 Scout (Meta · USA) and MiniMax M2 (MiniMax · China) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. Llama 4 Scout is rated conditional; MiniMax M2 is conditional. They part ways on licence: Llama 4 Scout is "Llama community", MiniMax M2 is "Modified MIT".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional Smaller Llama 4 variant: 17B active over 16 experts, multimodal. More self-hostable than Maverick. Same Llama community licence caveats. | Conditional 229B agent-focused model from MiniMax, Modified MIT. Strong software-engineering and tool-use benchmarks. Family has iterated fast (M2 / M2.1 / M2.5 / M2.7 across 2025-2026). Same Chinese-origin alignment and supply-chain considerations as DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-15 | 2026-04-16 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Llama community | Modified MIT |
| Commercial use | With caps | Yes |
| Training data | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Origin | USA | China |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 14/100 | 36/100 |
| Speed | 128 tok/s | 72 tok/s |
| Blended price | $0.29/M | $0.53/M |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.