Side-by-side comparison of Mistral 7B Instruct v0.2 (Mistral AI · France) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct (Mistral AI · France) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. Mistral 7B Instruct v0.2 is rated conditional; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct is EU-ready. On the four sovereignty dimensions we track, they score identically — the difference is in context and org posture.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | Conditional Based on published licence terms, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.2 is an EU-origin open-weight model under standard Apache 2.0 — commercial deployment and self-hosting are permitted without field-of-use restrictions. Training-data opacity is the primary EU AI Act Art. 53 gap, but the French controller, absence of CLOUD Act exposure, and Mistral's published DPA make this a strong baseline for regulated EU workloads. | EU-ready A rare combination of permissive licensing, EU provenance, and credible multilingual coverage — Apache 2.0 leaves commercial deployment essentially unconstrained, and Paris-based Mistral simplifies the GDPR controller story compared with US-hosted peers. The catch is the training corpus: Mistral has never published a meaningful dataset breakdown, so AI Act transparency obligations on training-data summaries land squarely on the deployer. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-17 | 2026-05-19 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial use | Unrestricted | Unrestricted |
| Training data | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Origin | EU (France) | EU (France) |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | 7/100 | — |
| Speed | 193 tok/s | — |
| Blended price | $0.25/M | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.