Side-by-side comparison of Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI · France) and Qwen 2.5 (Alibaba · China) for self-hosted deployment of the open-weight model. Mistral Medium 3.5 is rated EU-ready; Qwen 2.5 is conditional. They part ways on licence: Mistral Medium 3.5 is "Modified MIT", Qwen 2.5 is "Apache 2.0".
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Summary | ||
| Verdict | EU-ready Per Mistral's published license, Mistral Medium 3.5 ships under a Modified MIT License: vanilla-MIT terms for independent developers, startups and most enterprises, with a revenue-threshold carve-out that routes large companies back to a paid commercial agreement. Paris-headquartered vendor with EU jurisdiction end to end and a 256k-token context. Training-data composition is not published in the model card — usual caveat for high-assurance public-sector deployments. | Conditional Legally clean under Apache 2.0, but Chinese origin raises supply-chain and geopolitical questions. Vet carefully for sensitive use cases. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-05-03 | 2026-04-15 |
| Open-weight | ||
| Licence | Modified MIT | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial use | Permitted (revenue cap) | Yes |
| Training data | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Origin | EU (France) | China |
| Performance & pricing? | ||
| Quality index | — | 16/100 |
| Speed | — | 55 tok/s |
| Blended price | — | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | ||
No overlapping sources between the two entries.